Can Big Tech Fill Europe’s Cybersecurity Gaps? Microsoft Thinks So

When Microsoft announced its European Security Program (ESP), it framed the initiative as a contribution to regional cyber resilience across the continent. But this move carries broader implications.

Europe’s cybersecurity posture is under increasing strain, shaped by fragmented national frameworks, the growing sophistication of AI-driven threats, and escalating geopolitical tensions. According to Dragos’ Q1 2025 ransomware analysis, Europe accounted for 135 incidents, or 19% of global attacks, with the UK, Germany, and Italy hit hardest.

As governments look outward for scale and expertise, Microsoft is stepping in with real-time intelligence, cross-border coordination, and deep operational reach. The ESP arrives at a time when Europe is also working to reinforce digital sovereignty through local infrastructure and regulation.

We sat with experts to examine how Microsoft’s offer aligns with those ambitions and what experts believe is at stake in this evolving public-private security arrangement.

Table of Contents Table of Contents

1. Key Takeaways
2. Microsoft’s ESP Amid Europe’s Fragmented Security Landscape
3. What Microsoft Is Offering & What It Gets in Return
4. Weighing Security Partnerships Against Sovereignty Goals
5. Balancing Support & Sovereignty
6. The Bottom Line
7. FAQs
8. References

Show Full Guide

Table of Contents

1. Key Takeaways
2. Microsoft’s ESP Amid Europe’s Fragmented Security Landscape
3. What Microsoft Is Offering & What It Gets in Return
Show Full Guide
4. Weighing Security Partnerships Against Sovereignty Goals
5. Balancing Support & Sovereignty
6. The Bottom Line
7. FAQs
8. References

Microsoft’s ESP Amid Europe’s Fragmented Security Landscape

Europe’s cyber landscape has long been shaped by its complexity. National agencies often operate in silos, while coordination between member states has struggled to keep pace with the speed and scale of modern digital threats.

To this end, the bloc recently announced on June 6, 2025, that it will be harmonizing its fragmented cybersecurity operational structure.

Against this backdrop, Microsoft’s new European Security Program seems likely to fit into this unifying structure.

Announced in Berlin by company president Brad Smith, the ESP spans all 27 EU countries, as well as the UK, EFTA members, the Western Balkans, Monaco, and the Vatican.

It builds on the foundation of Microsoft’s existing Government Security Program (GSP), which already offered threat intelligence insights, cybercrime reports, state actor updates, and vulnerability alerts.

Sharing his thoughts with Techopedia about the program, Willy Leichter, CMO at PointGuard AI, called the initiative “a positive development for many European governments and agencies that lack the defensive scale and resources of Microsoft.”

He emphasized, however, that it must not replace existing national capabilities. He said:

“New security measures should be seen as additive, not as a replacement for existing defenses. Cyber attackers don’t respect digital borders, and governments should actively seek threat intelligence from all legitimate sources, regardless of origin.”

What Microsoft Is Offering & What It Gets in Return

The ESP will come to European governments in three core pillars: threat intelligence sharing, targeted cybersecurity investments, and broader public-private partnerships.

While Microsoft claims this whole initiative is free and designed to bolster resilience, it also tightens Microsoft’s role in shaping Europe’s security environment.

Under the first pillar, Microsoft said it will provide real-time, AI-enhanced threat intelligence to government agencies across the region. That includes alerts about ransomware campaigns, APT behavior, and disinformation operations driven by deepfake media. These insights come from Microsoft’s global security infrastructure, fed by the Digital Crimes Unit (DCU) and the Microsoft Threat Analysis Center (MTAC).

The second focuses on investment. Microsoft is embedding investigators at Europol’s European Cybercrime Centre, supporting NGO-led cyber defense efforts through the CyberPeace Institute, and working with the UK’s Laboratory for AI Security Research. It is also funding open-source initiatives through the GitHub Secure Open Source Fund.

On the third, Microsoft is expanding cooperation with law enforcement, like Europol, to dismantle cybercriminal networks. The Windows maker highlighted the recent takedown of Lumma malware operation that infected hundreds of thousands of European devices as an example of this approach.

For Roman Eloshvili, founder and CEO of XData Group, the program is a welcome step. He told Techopedia:

“Given the increasing volume and complexity of cyber threats, especially those powered by AI, Microsoft’s announcement makes sense as a strategic move.”

He sees value in improved access to advanced tools and cross-border coordination, but warned against defaulting to outsourced defense.

“Governments should not look to programs like Microsoft’s as their default solutions,” Eloshvili said.

He believes the solution lies in clear boundaries:

“Private companies should not replace sovereign responsibilities, but they can play a complementary role.”

Weighing Security Partnerships Against Sovereignty Goals

While Microsoft’s program may deliver security gains, it also raises questions about Europe’s long-term digital sovereignty posture.

For years, EU policy has emphasized digital sovereignty. Initiatives like the GAIA-X cloud federation, the EU Cybersecurity Certification Scheme (EUCS), and the Data Act reflect a vision where Europe controls its own digital infrastructure.

However, Microsoft’s expanding role appears to sit in tension with those goals. As a US-based cloud provider, it operates outside European jurisdiction.

Its infrastructure, data governance, and compliance policies must align with EU rules, but are still ultimately steered from Redmond.

Kai Wawrzinek, co-founder of Impossible Cloud Network, offered a strong critique of this reliance.

He told Techopedia:

“Nothing is truly free, especially when it comes to US hyperscalers. This ‘attract, extract’ cycle applies to all their services.”

Wawrzinek further argued that the growing role of US cloud providers in government infrastructure risks entrenching foreign control over critical systems. He said:

“Should we entrust our most sensitive infrastructure to a non-state, profit-driven entity that has previously attracted negative attention due to its susceptibility to US political influence?”

CMO at Mindgard, Fergal Glynn, shared similar concerns, warning European companies of over-dependency on foreign firms. He noted:

“Europe’s increasing reliance on US technology giants undermines its digital sovereignty. The continent is sliding into the status of a ‘quasi-colony’ in terms of digital infrastructure.”

Balancing Support & Sovereignty

Many AI governance experts we spoke to called for a dual-track strategy that will allow the EU to accept Microsoft’s help today, while actively building toward independence.

Timo Koster, strategic advisor at BforeAI, recognized Microsoft’s initiative as useful but questioned its long-term fit.

“Dependence on US providers, whether it be for support in combating cyber threats or in data storage or investment and innovation, needs to be reduced,” he said. He points out that no European alternative has stepped forward in the same way, suggesting that “a partnership with a European company in this initiative would be desirable.”

Glynn told Techopedia:

“Governments would be wise to accept Microsoft’s immediate support, while investing in improved local infrastructure.”

In his recommendation, he said that European nations should “ramp up local cybersecurity capacity through strategic investment, robust public-private partnerships, and national programs aimed at cultivating domestic expertise.”

Eloshvili echoed this, noting that governments need to “pair Microsoft’s tools with greater investment in local cyber capabilities” and avoid becoming “completely fangless in the fight against cybercrime.”

Koster agreed that more work is needed if Europe wants true deterrence. “Without the ability to predict and preempt attacks, and without forensics consistently identifying perpetrators, nothing prevents state and non-state actors from trying their luck,” he said.

The Bottom Line

Microsoft’s ESP may offer governments short-term advantages, but it also reshapes the balance of power behind the scenes.

As big tech gains proximity to national decision-making, questions around control, leverage, and accountability become harder to ignore.

Europe’s cybersecurity gap is real, but so is the risk of allowing foreign infrastructure too deeply into public defense. For policymakers, the challenge is no longer whether to work with global tech providers, but how to do so without ceding long-term independence.

FAQs