RACI Chart

What is a RACI Chart?

An RACI chart is a powerful tool used in project management to assign and display responsibilities. It stands for Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed, and provides a clear framework for defining roles within a team.

Its primary purpose is to clarify the duties and expectations of every team member, ensuring that tasks are completed efficiently and effectively while minimizing confusion and overlapping responsibilities.


This structured delegation approach enhances accountability and streamlines communication, making it an indispensable resource in managing complex projects.



“Responsible” refers to the individuals or teams executing a specific task or activity within a project. They are not merely involved; they are the ones who must complete the task or ensure its completion.

Having at least one ‘Responsible’ person for each task ensures clarity. However, multiple people can be labeled as ‘Responsible’ for a single task, especially in larger or more complex projects.

This designation helps establish clear lines of duty and aids in accountability, ensuring that every task has a dedicated person or team focused on its accomplishment.

The ‘Responsible’ role is foundational in a RACI matrix, as it directly ties to the practical, day-to-day progress of the project.



The term “Accountable” denotes the individual responsible for completing a task. This person, often a project manager or team leader, is the one who answers for the outcome of the task.

While multiple people can be responsible for executing parts of a task, only one should be accountable to ensure clear ownership to avoid confusion.

The accountable person has the authority to approve or reject the work and is the final decision-maker. They oversee and validate the work carried out by those responsible.

This role is crucial for maintaining the project’s direction and integrity, ensuring that tasks align with the business objectives and standards.



“Consulted” refers to individuals or groups who provide valuable expertise necessary for a task or decision. These individuals are typically subject matter experts or stakeholders with a vested interest in the project.

Their role is to advise and offer insights that help those responsible and accountable make informed decisions and carry out tasks effectively.

Inclusion in the ‘Consulted’ category is essential to ensure that a broad range of perspectives and knowledge is considered, enhancing the quality and feasibility of project decisions.

Importantly, while consulted parties contribute through their expertise, someone else is executing or ultimately accountable for the task.

This distinction balances gaining valuable input and keeping decision-making and execution processes streamlined and clear.



“Informed” identifies those individuals or groups who need to be kept updated on the progress or outcomes of a task but do not have an active role in its execution or in the project planning.

Typically, these are stakeholders or members of the organization who benefit from knowing the status and results of various activities. Keeping them informed ensures transparency.

This communication can be crucial for maintaining organizational alignment and support, particularly in larger or more complex projects where multiple departments or teams may indirectly affect the project’s outcomes.

The informed group doesn’t contribute to the task directly nor make decisions regarding it; their role is to receive information. This helps prevent unnecessary interference in the task while ensuring that key parties know important developments and outcomes.

How Does the RACI Model Work?

RACI Chart Meaning

The RACI model operates by mapping out tasks, milestones, or decisions against the roles within a project, clearly delineating who is Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed for each item.

This model is typically visualized in a chart format, creating a matrix that intersects roles with project tasks. Each cell in this matrix is filled with one of the RACI codes (R, A, C, I), signifying the involvement of each role in a specific task.

To create a RACI chart, simply:

  1. List All the Tasks or Deliverables

    The first step is to list all the tasks or deliverables of a project in the first column of a table. You list all the project roles or team members along the top row.
  2. Assign the Appropriate RACI Codes

    Then, you go through each task and assign the appropriate RACI codes to each role concerning that task. The aim is to ensure that every task has at least one person Responsible and one Accountable while also identifying who needs to be Consulted and Informed.

For example, with a project management tool, you can create a board or space where each task is listed. For a task like “Develop Marketing Strategy,” you might have:

  • A marketing manager as Accountable
  • Several marketing team members as Responsible
  • A sales manager and a finance analyst as Consulted for their input
  • The CEO as Informed about the final strategy

This clear delineation of duties helps to prevent common project pitfalls such as role confusion, task duplication, and accountability issues.

The RACI model promotes a smoother, more organized approach to project management by visually laying out who is responsible for what.

Pros and Cons of the RACI Framework


  • Enhances role clarity
  • Improves project accountability
  • Facilitates and streamlines communication
  • Prevents role overlap confusion
  • Aids in decision-making


  • Can be time-consuming to set up
  • Over-specification can lead to micromanagement
  • It can lead to inflexibility regarding dynamic projects
  • Limited effectiveness in very small or overly large organizations
  • Effectiveness relies on the accurate identification of roles

Alternatives to the RACI Matrix

The RACI model isn’t the only option businesses have available to them. Here are others worth noting:

DACI Model

The DACI model simplifies the approach. It stands for Driver, Approver, Contributor, and Informed:

  • The Driver is responsible for managing the progress of the work, similar to the Responsible role in RACI.
  • Like the Accountable role, the Approver has the final decision-making authority.
  • Contributors assist the Driver, similar to the Consulted category in RACI.
  • Finally, the Informed role remains the same, designated for those who need to stay updated on the progress.

The DACI model is particularly effective in environments that prioritize streamlined decision-making processes.


RAPID is an acronym for Recommend, Agree, Perform, Input, and Decide. This framework is designed to clarify decision-making processes within a project.

  • The Recommend role proposes actions
  • The Agree role represents stakeholders who must agree to the proposed actions
  • The Perform role is akin to the Responsible role in the RACI matrix.
  • Input is similar to the Consulted category, offering advice and expertise.
  • The Decide role is critical as it identifies the person with the final decision-making authority.

The RAPID model is beneficial when decision-making is a primary focus and needs to be expedited.

The Bottom Line

The RACI chart is a vital tool in project management, offering clear role delineation and improved communication. While it has its pros and cons, its structured approach is pivotal for effective team collaboration and task management.

Alternatives like DACI, RAPID, and others provide additional flexibility, catering to varied project needs and decision-making styles and ensuring a model to suit every organizational context.


Is RACI outdated?

What is the main benefit of making a RACI chart?

What does RACI stand for?


Related Terms

Aidan Weeks
Engineering and Technology Expert

Aidan Weeks, a Master's graduate in Mechanical Engineering, has thrived as a freelance writer for over three years. Specializing in tech, engineering, and B2B sectors, Aidan adeptly crafts web copy, blog posts, manuals, product pages, and more, making complex concepts accessible and engaging. His transition from academia to full-time writing reflects his passion for bridging technical expertise with clear, informative content.