Pull Request

What is a Pull Request?

A pull request, often abbreviated as PR, is a feature in version control systems like Git. It signifies a request to merge code from one branch into another, usually from the developer’s personal branch into a main or development branch.


When a developer makes changes or additions to a codebase, they can submit a pull request to propose their modifications to the project maintainers. This system is fundamental in platforms like GitHub and GitLab.

The primary functions of a pull request are:

  1. It ensures every piece of code is reviewed before integration. This maintains code quality and consistency.
  2. It fosters collaborative software development by providing a platform for discussion, feedback, and iteration on the proposed changes.

Simply put, pull requests streamline the process of code contribution, making software projects more robust and collaborative.

How Does a Pull Request Work?

A pull request is like a structured conversation around code changes. Here’s a step-by-step breakdown of the standard process.

  1. Creating a Feature Branch: When a developer wants to add a new feature or fix an issue, they create a separate branch from the main codebase. This “feature branch” ensures they can make changes without affecting the primary, stable version.
  2. Making Changes: Within this new branch, the developer introduces the necessary changes to the code. This can be adding a new function, tweaking existing code, fixing a bug, and so on.
  3. Submitting the Pull Request: Once satisfied with the changes, the developer submits the pull request. This is like saying, “I’ve made some changes and would like them reviewed before they become part of the main code.”
  4. Code Review: Projects maintainers or designated developers will review the proposed changes. They might suggest modifications, ask for clarifications, or give the green light if everything looks good.
  5. Merging: If the review process goes smoothly and all parties are in agreement, the changes from the feature branch are merged into the main branch.

The Role of Code Reviews

Code reviews are an essential step in the pull request process. They ensure that more than one pair of eyes scrutinizes every line of code. This collective scrutiny catches potential bugs, improves code quality, and fosters a shared understanding of the project’s direction.

Benefits of Using Pull Request

Pull requests play an important role in ensuring the quality of software. By inviting multiple individuals to review changes, they act as a checkpoint, significantly reducing errors or oversights in the code.

They also establish a forum for team members to communicate, offer suggestions, and refine the project. This encourages teamwork and bolsters a shared understanding.

On the practical side, pull requests provide a clear history of changes, making it simpler to trace back modifications or understand the evolution of the project.

Pull Request Examples

Here are a couple of real-world examples of the practical applications of pull requests:

Example 1: An Open Source Project Accepting a Feature Contribution

Imagine an open-source project that helps users track their carbon footprint.

A software enthusiast discovers this hypothetical app and sees an opportunity to enhance it with a new feature: a daily reminder for users to input their activities.

The software enthusiast doesn’t have direct access to modify the project, so he:

  1. Forks the project, creating a personal copy.
  2. Creates a feature branch named “daily-reminder” in his fork.
  3. Implements the daily reminder feature within this branch.
  4. Submits a pull request to the main repository, detailing his changes and how they benefit users.

The maintainers of the project review the enthusiast’s contribution, suggest some minor tweaks, and once those are addressed, they merge his changes into the main codebase.

Thanks to the pull request mechanism, a community member has enhanced an open-source project.

Example 2: A Team of Developers Collaborating on a New Release

Consider a tech startup that’s developing an innovative messaging platform. The team plans to release a version 2.0 with a few new features, one of which is voice messaging.

  1. A developer on the team creates a new branch named “voice-messageing” to work on this specific feature without disturbing the main code.
  2. After a few days of coding and testing, the developer believes she’s successfully completed the coding of the voice messaging capability.
  3. The developer initiates a pull request, inviting her team to review her work.
  4. Her colleagues examine the code, test the functionality, and provide feedback.
  5. After a few rounds of revisions and discussions, the team is content. The feature is merged into the development branch designated for the 2.0 release.

This scenario shows how pull requests, in a collaborative team setting, ensure every new feature is thoroughly vetted before it’s part of the main product.

Best Practices for Creating and Managing Pull Requests

Pull requests are foundational to collaborative software development. However, as with any tool or process, their effectiveness depends on how they’re used. By following certain best practices, teams can streamline their workflows and maximize the benefits of pull requests.

Best Practice Explanation & Importance
Descriptive Commit Messages and Pull Request Titles Every code modification conveys a purpose. Detailed messages ensure clarity for team members both presently and in the future. Instead of “Fixed bugs,”  use “Resolved login error for multi-factor authentication” to better illustrate changes.
Keeping Pull Requests Small and Focused Large pull requests can be overwhelming. It’s more efficient to keep changes compact and centered on one topic. Smaller requests simplify the review process, ensuring focused discussions and reduced chances of oversight.
Continuous Integration (CI) Checks Automated CI tools test proposed changes against the main codebase, checking that new contributions don’t break existing functionalities. These checks provide an initial layer of quality assurance, confirming that software retains its intended functionality.
Code Reviews by Peers After passing CI checks, pull requests should go through human review. Fellow developers offer insights on code quality, potential enhancements, and alignment with the project’s vision. This offers assessment beyond what automated tests offer.


Adopting these practices will result in improved code quality, clearer communication, and a smoother collaboration experience.

Common Pull Request Challenges

While the benefits of pull requests are many, they also aren’t without their own set of challenges. Here are a few of the main ones you’ll encounter, and some suggestions on how to mitigate them.

Merge Conflicts

Merge conflicts arise when simultaneous changes conflict in a codebase. They’re a common hiccup in collaborative projects.

To sidestep them, always sync with the main branch before pushing updates. If they do occur, engage with the involved parties, and use your version control system’s tools to iron out the discrepancies.

Maintaining Code Quality and Codebase Consistency

A diverse group of contributors can sometimes lead to varying code quality and inconsistencies.

Counteract this by setting up a unified coding style guide. Integrating automated tools, like linters, can also help enforce these standards, ensuring everyone’s code aligns with the project’s guidelines.

Handling Feedback and Iterating Based on Reviews

Reviews are essential, though they might sometimes feel overwhelming. It’s important to remember that feedback targets the code, not the coder.

Embrace critiques with an open perspective, seeking clarifications when needed, and iterating to refine the product. This collaborative approach paves the way for a more polished and cohesive codebase.

The Bottom Line

Pull requests stand as a cornerstone in today’s software development landscape. They streamline collaboration, facilitate code reviews, and ensure the delivery of high-quality software. But as pivotal as they are, mastering pull requests requires more than just a basic understanding.

Embracing best practices and remaining receptive to feedback will not only enhance the efficacy of pull requests but also improve the overall quality and integrity of software projects.


Related Terms

Marshall Gunnell
IT & Cybersecurity Expert

Marshall, a Mississippi native, is a dedicated expert in IT and cybersecurity with over a decade of experience. Along Techopedia, his bylines can be found on Business Insider, PCWorld, VGKAMI, How-To Geek, and Zapier. His articles have reached a massive readership of over 100 million people. Marshall previously served as the Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) and technical staff writer at StorageReview, providing comprehensive news coverage and detailed product reviews on storage arrays, hard drives, SSDs, and more. He also developed sales strategies based on regional and global market research to identify and create new project initiatives.  Currently, Marshall resides in…