OpenAI’s AGI Ambitions: Beyond the Hype and Headlines

Why Trust Techopedia

As the curtains close on this chapter of OpenAI's saga, there are curious signs that something spooked key team members.

The dust is finally settling after a turbulent few weeks for OpenAI. As we attempt to unravel the chaos surrounding CEO Sam Altman’s off-and-on-again firing and rehiring, the situation’s complexity reveals many more facets.

According to Reuters, company researchers wrote a foreboding letter to the board in a dramatic prelude to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman’s temporary ouster. They “disclosed a groundbreaking AI discovery that they feared could be hazardous to humanity”.

This revelation, combined with the unverified project ‘Q*,’ known for its promising mathematical problem-solving abilities, allegedly played a pivotal role in the board’s decision to remove Altman. This was despite the looming threat of mass employee resignations supporting him.

The researchers’ cautionary note and concerns about the premature commercialization of such advancements underscored the intricate interplay of ethical considerations, technological innovations, and leadership dynamics at OpenAI, especially in their quest for Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).

AGI is at its early stages but is seen as an advanced form of AI designed to emulate human cognitive abilities, thus enabling it to undertake a broad spectrum of tasks that typically require human intelligence.

Apprehensions about AGI arise from its potential to significantly impact society, encompassing ethical, social, and moral challenges and the risk of its exploitation by malevolent entities for unethical purposes.


In a blog post earlier this year, Altman wrote that “because the upside of AGI is so great, we do not believe it is possible or desirable for society to stop its development forever. Instead, society and the developers of AGI have to figure out how to get it right.” 

So, can it all go wrong?

Redefining Work: AGI’s Impact Beyond ChatGPT’s Job Disruption

The critical distinction between AI and AGI lies in their learning capabilities. Traditional AI learns through human-provided information, whereas AGI can independently seek new knowledge, recognize its knowledge gaps, and adjust its algorithms based on real-world discrepancies. Absent in current AI, this self-teaching ability represents a significant technological leap. 

Last year, Altman set off a few alarm bells on the Greymatter Podcast when he compared his vision of AGI to a “median human” and how AI could do anything that a remote coworker is doing behind a computer — from learning how to be a doctor to learning how to go be a very competent coder. A theme he repeated in September this year.

“For me, AGI is the equivalent of a median human that you could hire as a coworker.”

With its autonomous system and human-like reasoning, AGI promises to solve complex problems. Unsurprisingly, experts believe it will emulate human cognition and learn cumulatively, thus improving its skills rapidly and extensively.

These comments suggest that workers’ future problems could be much bigger than ChatGPT taking their jobs. 

Did Something Scare OpenAI Chief Scientist Ilya Sutskever?

Ilya Sutskever, Co-Founder and Chief Scientist at OpenAI has been at the forefront of the company’s recent leadership tumult, primarily due to his deep-seated concerns about the safety of AI superintelligence.

Contrasting with CEO Sam Altman’s more aggressive approach, Sutskever’s cautious stance stems from his belief that rapid advancements and deployments in AI, particularly models like ChatGPT, haven’t been adequately vetted for safety. 

In his recent TED Talk, recorded before the fallout, he envisioned how AGI could surpass human intelligence and profoundly impact our world while presenting an optimistic view on ensuring its safe and beneficial development through unprecedented collaboration.

However, it appears that something changed, and recent events prompted Elon Musk to warn that ‘something scared’ the OpenAI chief scientist.

From Speculation to Limitation

Just over a week ago, on the Robot Heart burners’ panel, Sam Altman reflected on the moment they asked themselves. “Is this a tool or a creature we’ve built?” Shortly after, he was fired, sparking speculation about a mysterious breakthrough that could ‘threaten humanity.’

However, before we get too carried away with the hype filling our newsfeeds, a recent study by Google researchers has cast doubt on the immediate feasibility of AGI after revealing limitations in transformer technology, which underpins current AI models like ChatGPT.

The research found that transformers struggle with tasks outside their training data, challenging the notion that AI is on the brink of matching human generalizing capabilities. 

Experts, acknowledging transformers’ advanced nature, caution against overestimating their current capabilities, underlining the need for more advanced AI forms for true generalization. 

Hype vs Reality

Recent reports that OpenAI’s latest AI model has outperformed grade-school levels math predictably fuel fears of an AI-driven apocalypse and a dystopian future of mass unemployment.

But, the existing models’ inability to reason and develop new ideas instead of merely parroting information from their training data is emerging as a significant limitation.

This raises the question: Is the hype more about attracting investment? Could it be a mere publicity stunt to reassure investors after recent events?

If we dare to step back from the sensationalist headlines and bold claims, it becomes clear that there’s a lack of published research papers substantiating these “rumors.”

This absence of solid academic backing casts doubt on the progress towards Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Even if OpenAI is edging closer to AGI, the evident gap in AI’s capacity to adapt and learn as humans do suggests we should moderate our expectations for the imminent realization of AGI despite its aspirational status in the realm of AI development.

The Bottom Line

As the curtains close on this latest chapter of OpenAI’s saga, it’s hard not to draw parallels to HBO dramas ‘Succession’ and ‘Silicon Valley.’

In a plot twist worthy of prime-time TV, the tale oscillates between Altman’s visionary proclamations and Sutskever’s cautious revelations. When you think you’ve grasped the narrative, a new development adds another layer of intrigue. 

Maybe the story of OpenAI, like the best of television, keeps us on the edge of our seats, eagerly anticipating the next episode while reminding us that reality can often be stranger and more enthralling than fiction in AI development.


Related Reading

Related Terms

Neil C. Hughes
Senior Technology Writer
Neil C. Hughes
Senior Technology Writer

Neil is a freelance tech journalist with 20 years of experience in IT. He’s the host of the popular Tech Talks Daily Podcast, picking up a LinkedIn Top Voice for his influential insights in tech. Apart from Techopedia, his work can be found on INC, TNW, TechHQ, and Cybernews. Neil's favorite things in life range from wandering the tech conference show floors from Arizona to Armenia to enjoying a 5-day digital detox at Glastonbury Festival and supporting Derby County.  He believes technology works best when it brings people together.